MILK 2008: THE TWINKIE DEFENCE

THE BEST COUNTER-ARGUMENT AGAINST DEMOCRACY I’VE MET IN THE PAST YEAR.


http://operawire.com/opera-meets-film-harvey-milk-as-a-20th-century-tosca/

Milk constantly talks about politics being a theater for him and when he arrives in City Hall, he notes that it is his new “theater.”

Also interesting to note how his unstable lover took his own life.
Considering the etymology for “Circus”, and the history of theater…

Milk’s battle is initially with the local police, then the local politicians,
and eventually, a nationwide movement against gay rights.

This noted escalation is very interesting, and I will make the case – could be far more prominent in the film itself. Just think about this spiral motion again, imagine it inside your imagination…


Civil rights or civil war. Gay rights?

Russian language has an idiom : “Роль личности в истории.”
It translates into “The role of a person in history”. From wikipedia:
“совокупность представлений о месте человека в течение исторического времени и пространства, в частности, о её коллективных, групповых и персональных ролях, общественных, профессиональных, семейных практиках, реальных и возможных жизненных сценариях, связанности конкретной личности с известными событиями, явлениями, процессами, фактами и тому подобное.”


The issue is portrayed, I think, brilliantly, in the debate held between H. Milk and the homophobe. The following is stated, in regard to legislation No.6:

“WE DON’T ALLOW PEOPLE, WHO PRACTICE BESTIALITY, TO TEACH OUR CHILDREN, AND THAT’S BECAUSE – IT’S ILLEGAL”

LET ME GET THAT STRAIGHT FOR YOU:
I mean to get your attention to read in between the lines here:
The ONLY REASON, is that the practice of bestiality is not legal, FOR NOW.
Not that it is morally wrong, but because on some basic level, people just had to make a law for themselves, WHICH THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO CHANGE IN THE FUTURE. This is his “case”. Not what he means, but you have to see this person doesn’t know what he is saying, truly.

Of course, he means to mock homosexuality by degrading it to the level of animism, when calling them “zoophiles”. Thus, only proving his homophobia to be a covert (re)ligious misanthropy, as he does not know the human kind.

I BET YOU – ANY PSYCHOPATHY TESTING OF THOSE “CHRISTIANS” WOULD PROVE THIS.

HERE, THE COMPARISON TO HITLER’S GERMANY WASN’T A MISTAKE.
YOU SEE, HITLER WAS VOTED IN BY DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS. NOT THAT MONARCHY IS BETTER. BUT…

MANY THINK DEMOCRACIES TO BE THE RULE OF THE PEOPLE.
FIRST OF ALL, THERE’S A CONTRADICTION HERE, AS THE RULE OF THE ELECTED IS ONLY AS GOOD AS THE MORAL OF THE PEOPLE, BEING WE CANNOT BRING IMMORALITY INTO EXISTENCE BY VOTING.
AT LEAST, UNCHALLENGED, WE CAN NOT… WE CANNOT IGNORE CONSEQUENCES.

AND SECOND, THEY CHANGED THE TERM ALTOGETHER – OCHLOCRACY IS THE RULE OF EQUAL-RIGHTED PEOPLE, WHILE IN A DEMOCRACY – THE VOTE IS PRESERVED EXCLUSIVELY TO MEN WHO ARE OVER 20, AND OWN SLAVES.

DEMOCRACY IS – ULTIMATELY A SATANIC, SODOM AND GOMORRAH REGIME, IN WHICH ANY SLAVE IS SEARCHING FOR A MASTER, AND VICE VERSA, IN THE AIM TO RAPE EACH OTHER SOME MORE.

IT IS NO MISTAKE THAT WHEN MILK’S STRAIGHT SUPPORTER IS CHANGING SIDES,
THE ISSUE OF HIM BEING LOBBIED IS BROUGHT UP. RESEARCH THAT TERM AND HOW IT OPERATES.

Lobbying (like soliciting) is the kind of behavior that actually shifted the classical understanding of the story of the twin cities, Sodom and Gomorrah.
The sinful cities were destroyed not for direct debauchery, the teaching goes, but for them stranding off the road of righteousness –
in that which they abandoned the principle of caring for one another.
The argument against homosexuals or any like that –
being sodomites is a misquote. Simple as that.
The people of S&G willfully disregarded natural rights, raped instead of consenting, and more than anything- engaged in the satanic belief of “every man for themselves”. Help for a fellow human being was their biggest transgression, and they ruthlessly treated all strangers…

DAN WHITE’S LAWYER’S DEFENCE TRIED THAT HIS DIET OF “JUNK FOOD” LED TO BRAIN INSTABILITY.

ASK YOURSELVES – IN WHAT ENVIRONMENT IS IT POSSIBLE, THAT ANY RESPECTED PERSON SHOULD EAT JUNK FOOD? HOW ABOUT A SOCIETY WERE THE ELECTED OFFICIALS EAT EXCLUSIVELY JUNK FOOD?
IF, ON THE OTHER HAND, THIS WAS DONE INTENTIONALLY, TO CREATE A DISTURBANCE IN THE MIND, WHICH EVIDENTLY – LED TO KILLING, THEN HOW COME JUNK FOOD IS STILL LEGAL? HOW COME THIS IS THE “SOILENT GREEN” OF OUR TIME?

PURIFICATION OF THE MIND COMES FROM PURIFYING THE BODY.



“… THEY DON’T WANT THAT. THAT DOESN’T HELP ‘THEM’ …“
– GEORGE CARLIN.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s